School of Information - The University of TexasSkip to content
Home About School of Information Academic Programs Admissions Courses People & Groups Research & Publications Computing Resources Career Services
 
   

Information Technologies and the Information Professions

School of Information

The University of Texas


Grading Standards for Graduate Writing

Danielle Cunniff Plumer
Revised April 12, 2003


 
A

Superior work. Demonstrates a high degree of mastery of the course content.

  • Is developed well, convincingly and thoroughly, with effective support that is specific, interesting, and appropriate
  • Possesses sentence variety
  • Exhibits sophisticated, appropriate use of transitions
  • Has few, if any, mechanical, grammatical, spelling, or diction errors
  • Demonstrates command of mature and unpretentious diction
B

Good Work. This grade represents solid and acceptable performance, work that is consistent with academic expectations of students in a graduate program. A “B” paper shares most characteristics of an “A” paper, but

  • Has some minor lapses in development of the central idea
  • Has some minor lapses in organization
  • Has an occasional ineffective transition
  • Contains a few sentences that are awkward or ineffective
  • Has less varied sentence structures
  • Is less sophisticated in its handling of the topic
C

Unsatisfactory Work. In graduate school, the grade of “C” is considered unsatisfactory. Students receiving this grade should consult with the instructor in order to improve their future work. A “C” paper is generally competent, but compared to a “B” paper, it

  • Has a weaker or formulaic thesis and less effective development
  • Contains some lapses in organization
  • Has poor or awkward transitions
  • Has more mechanical, grammatical, and diction problems
  • Is effective but unsophisticated in its handling of the topic
D

Unacceptable Work. Unlike a C paper, a “D” paper most likely demonstrates one or more of the following qualities:

  • Presents a thesis too vague or too obvious to be developed effectively
  • Displays major organizational problems
  • Lacks adequate support for its thesis
  • Has confusing transitions or lacks transitions
  • Contains major problems with diction, grammar, mechanics, or spelling
  • Is ineffective in its handling of the topic
F

Failing Work. An “F” paper is seriously flawed. It demonstrates one of more of the following qualities:

  • Has no clear thesis or central topic
  • Displays random organization
  • Lacks adequate support or specific development
  • Includes irrelevant details
  • Fails to fulfill assignment or is unduly brief
  • Contains errors in diction, grammar, mechanics, or spelling which impede understanding
  • Is academically dishonest or plagiarized