Professor Fran Miksa's article, "The DDC Relative Index," has
been selected as the best article published in Volume 42 of Cataloging &
Classification Quarterly.
The award panel, composed from among the CCQ editorial board, consisted of
Nancy J. Williamson, Michael Carpenter, and Brad Young (Chair) issued the
following comments:
"The DDC Relative Index" by Francis Miksa is a detailed analysis of the
intricacies of the various indexes to the Dewey Decimal Classification,
their origin, development, structure, and their unique and complex nature.
It is very thorough and detailed research in which the author sets out his
approach in the form of three questions to which he seeks answers. These
questions focus on the fundamental aspects of the indexes the
representation of the concepts, their conceptual context in relation to both
their notational location and their meaning at those locations, and the
relationships between the indexes and the special auxiliary tables. The
analysis is detailed and extensive and reaches across the indexes to all
twenty-two editions of DDC since its first publication in 1876. The author
approaches his research systematically using the three aspects and the
conclusions reveal both strengths and weaknesses of the system and
identifies areas for further inquiry.
In the course of the research, the author exhibits a highly intelligent
grasp of the intricate system he is analyzing and has a deep and theoretical
understanding of the complex conceptual relationships among subjects
generally. For those who create indexes of this kind, the article has much
to say about their design and about the nature of concept relationships. As
well, cataloging practitioners could benefit a great deal from what the
author has to say, that would aid in their intelligent use of the indexes in
practice. The research methodology is well designed and Miksa has a clear
writing style that results in a logical and systematic presentation.
Moreover, he has managed to achieve his goal of studying the important
features of the indexes without becoming overwhelmed by the sheer
magnitude of the subject. By and large the sources are the indexes
themselves and there are useful examples and extensive footnotes. The
research is original and, indeed, the author certainly accomplishes what he
had set out to do.
Congratulations Fran.