 |
Documentation is an important part of
the standards of practice of the American Institute for Conservation.
Conservation treatment documentation contains valuable information
about materials and techniques used and should be retained with the
object as a part of its history.
Identification | Objective | Significance
| Description | Condition | Proposal
| Testing | Report
IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION
| Owner/Custodian |
Center for American History |
| Address |
University of Texas at Austin |
| Curator |
Brenda Gunn |
| Custodian Call Number |
AR 98-235.20 |
| Title/Subject/Description |
Houston/Raguet Letter |
| Creator |
Sam Houston |
| Date of Production |
December 7, 1838 |
| Place of Production |
Texas |
| Approx. Dimensions (hxw) |
9 3/4" x 15 3/4" (unfolded) |
TREATMENT OBJECTIVE
Reverse previous harmful conservation treatment and stabilize for
research use.
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
This letter is from a series of correspondence from Sam Houston to
Anna Raguet. Houston, the first president of the Republic of
Texas, met Raguet in 1833, when she was fourteen, and a courtship
ensued. Houston attempted to obtain a divorce from his first
wife in order to marry Anna, but was unsuccessful. Houston was
finally granted a divorce in 1837, however Anna declined to marry
him. Eventually, she married one of Houston's closest advisors,
who had delivered many of Houston's letters to Anna.
The letters are now part of the James R. and Ewing B. Irion: Houston-Anna
Raguet Papers and are part of the collections at the Center for American
History.
This letter is sheet of paper folded into a folio. It appears
that at least one other page from the letter is missing, as there
is no salutation.
top
DESCRIPTION
Handwritten letter 9 3/4" x 15 3/4" (unfolded)

Recto
Verso

Transmitted Light
Media
|
|
The document is written in iron-gall ink, apparently
applied with a steel dip pen, in a wide variety of intensities.
Much pressure was used in the application of the ink, so many
of the letters have extremely heavy down strokes. Some
of the flourishes and crossbars of the letters are written with
a much lighter pressure.
|
|
|
There is also a blot on the right side of
the verso that appears to have been caused by a drop of ink
falling on the paper. All of the ink appears to be of
the same batch.
|
|
|
The address panel (left side of
verso) is marked with a "V" approximately 3/4"
tall, in bright blue ink. This appears to be a cataloger's
annotation. |
|
|
There are faint graphite markings
on the address panel, to the right of the address, as well as
a small graphite line under Anna Raguet's name on the signature
page (recto, right). This line appears to be a flourish
from a letter, however the rest of the letter has been removed
with the missing corner. |
|
|
There is a graphite number 12
in the upper left corner of the recto that appears to be a cataloger's
annotation. |
Primary
Support
|
|
| The letter is written on handmade paper with a wove texture.
The original color was probably cream or off-white. There
is a faint watermark, however it has been rendered mostly illegible
by the writing and the silk on the letter. The first three
letters of the watermark appear to be AMI. The paper is
fairly crisp in texture. There is a papermaker's tear
above the name "Raguet" on the lower right of the
recto. |
|
|
The paper is embossed in two places with a circle approximately
1/2" in diameter at the center top of the letter. The
embossing is now illegible but probably is an ownership marking.
The sheet of paper was folded into a folio, which was later folded
to make an envelope.

|
|
There are remnants of a shiny orange-red seal
at the center of the verso. Fragments of the same seal
material are also scattered over the address panel. The
fragments are approximately the size of the head of a pin.
|
 |
One larger fragment (approximately 1/8"
across) is trapped under the silk over Houston's signature. |
Secondary
Support
|
|
The document has had a fine layer
of silk applied to the recto to prevent further tearing. |
Housing
The document is housed in a Permalife paper folder. This folder
is housed within a document box.
top
CONDITION
The overall condition of the document is poor.
Media
|
|
The iron gall ink is faded, almost to the point of illegibility,
in some areas of the document.
This fading appears to correspond to two large bands of
staining across the top and bottom of the document.
The iron gall ink is sinking through the document badly,
although it does not interfere with legibility.
|
 |
There is less sinking apparent on the stained areas, which
may be either a result of decreased transparency of the paper,
or washing out of the ink.
The color of the ink ranges from the palest brown in the faded
areas to nearly black on the heaviest down strokes.
The ink has the flat appearance of iron gall ink that has
been washed. This is consistent with the application
of silk.
|
|
|
The blue ink "V" on the verso shows
some signs of solubility. It has spread slightly, and
is darker at the edges of the ink lines than at the center.
The graphite markings appear to be stable. |
Primary Support
The primary support is very yellowed. Its current color
is a very pale yellow-brown.

 |
The primary support appears clean, and it is likely that
surface cleaning was performed prior to silking. There
are, however, many stains on the document. There is
a large light brown stain across the top of the document,
and another large light brown stain across the bottom of the
document. These stains are associated with increased
opacity of the support. The silk has also come off in
the areas of staining. These appear to be water stains.
There are also black mold stains at the upper center of the
recto of the letter. |
|
|
There are a few small accretions of paper
at the lower center of the left of the verso. These
are almost certainly associated with a small loss at the
lower center of the right of the recto.
|
The document is heavily creased along all fold lines, especially
along the address panel. These creases have associated tears
and losses at every intersection of the tears, as well as along
the center fold.
There are four large losses in the document. Two of these
are certainly associated with Anna Raguet's breaking of the seal
and opening the letter. These are located at the address panel's
left and right.
|
|
|
The third large loss is at the left of the text
page of the verso in a position that indicates that it, too,
may have come from opening the letter. The edges of
the two losses from the seal both have many creased back fragments
of paper.
|
|
|
|
The fourth large loss is the entire lower
right corner of the recto, which appears to have been cut
out with scissors
|
|
|
There are a few small edge tears, extending approximately 1/2"
into the support.
The seal remnants appear to be stable and strongly attached, however,
the fragment caught under the silk in Houston's signature may
be loose once the silk is removed.
Secondary Support
The silk is very soft, and its attachment to the support is tenuous.
The silk covers only approximately the horizontal center third
of the document, although fibers and small patches of silk indicate
that originally silk was applied to the entire recto of the document.
It is likely that the silk was detached at the time that the water
staining occurred.
Approximately 16 inches of glassine tape have been applied over
the silk on the recto of the document. This shiny paper adhesive
tape is also tenuously attached to the document, and can be manually
removed. It does not appear to have caused any staining of
the letter. It is anticipated that the tape will be easily
removed when the silk is removed.
top
TREATMENT PROPOSAL
1. Remove silk and tape aqueously.
2. Alkalinize.
3. Consolidate document as appropriate.
4. House in same folder. Estimated Treatment Time: 15 Hours
TESTING
Three types of testing were performed on this document.
A microscopic sample of the ink was tested with potassium ferrocyanate
and hydrochloric acid to verify that it is indeed iron gall ink.
The sample turned blue when touched with both of these solutions,
which indicates iron gall ink.
A droplet of water was placed on the red seal to test its resistance
to water. The seal did not swell, soften, or become detached
from the support when wet.
Solubility testing was performed for each media (iron gall ink,
blue ink, graphite).
| Time |
Iron Gall Ink |
Blue Ink |
Graphite |
| Touch with damp blotter |
No offset |
No offset |
No offset |
| 1 second |
No offset |
No offset |
No offset |
| 2 seconds |
No offset |
No offset |
No offset |
| 5 seconds |
No offset |
No offset |
No offset |
| 10 seconds |
No offset |
No offset |
No offset |
| 20 seconds |
No offset |
No offset |
No offset |
| 30 seconds |
No offset |
No offset |
No offset |
| 1 minute |
No offset |
No offset |
No offset |
| 2 minutes |
No offset |
No offset |
No offset |
| Droplet applied with brush |
No change |
No change |
No change |
top
TREATMENT REPORT

Recto

Verso
- Silk and tape were removed in a bath of deionized water conditioned
with a drop of a saturated solution of calcium hydroxide.
- The document was alkalinized in a dilute calcium carbonate solution
with a pH of approximately 8.5. The duration of this bath
was 7 minutes.
- The document was dried between blotter and press boards, under
weight.

Recto before mending

Verso before mending
|
|
|
|
- Removal of the silk and tape revealed a watermark on the
left side of the verso that had previously been obscured.
|
|

|
- The document was mended and filled with Japanese paper
toned with acrylic paints and wheat starch paste.
- The document was rehoused in the same folder and document
box.
|
|
|
- Four large losses were left unfilled. Three of these
were associated with opening the letter, and therefore have
artifactual significance. This decision is also consistent
with previous treatments on other letters in this series.
The fourth unfilled loss is the missing corner. This
was left unfilled because it poses no safety issues to the
document, and would be aesthetically unpleasing, if filled.
|
top |